Saxophone Instruction – Recording Techniques For Saxophone

March 9th, 2010


Image : http://www.flickr.com

Here are some techniques and ideas you may find useful for recording. Many of them will apply to other instruments as well. Whether you do it yourself or record in a studio or at live performances, it’s essential that you know how to get your best sound, and what to do with it once you have it tracked. Don’t assume that the engineer will know exactly how to get it for you – you will have to work together.

Like many acoustic instruments, the sax records well with the use of a condenser mic. Condenser mics differ from dynamic mics in that they usually require a battery (or phantom power supplied from the mixer) and have a broader pick up pattern which makes them less useful on stage because they tend to feed back. They provide a flatter response, meaning that all frequencies are presented more equally whereas dynamic mics are often ‘coloured’ to bring out voice tones.

When recording with a condenser mic, you can ‘back off’ with it at eye level up to three feet away from your face, or ‘close mic’ keeping it aimed near the bottom of the left hand over the bell as you would performing live. Most of us have discovered not to aim it down the bell as this can do some awesome damage when you let go with a low Bb. Your choice of mic, playing style, and recording set-up will determine just where to place it. If you are recording yourself, set up a few tracks to record and compare. You’ll need it later to set the equalization (EQ).

The Neumann U87 is the industry standard voice mic and sounds great on sax. If it’s high price ($1,000 +) is out of range you might consider a Sennheiser 441. It’s a dynamic mic with a flatter response than those designed for live vocal use. Even the Shure SM57 & 58 can work well for rock & blues but you’ll need to EQ a little. My recording mic of choice is the AKG C1000S. It brings out all the warm sax tones I can’t live without and works well with other instruments, e.g. acoustic guitar and drum overhead. It was fairly well priced at around $300. It can also be used live, and doesn’t feed back as much as I might have expected.

Using the direct in approach will require that you apply EQ during mixdown. I find that with the right mic, I usually don’t need to change too much, but if you are working with overdrive guitars and thick synth patches, you might need a little help. If you have sweepable midrange you can boost 5-8K for those upper-mid voice tones. If you are using a dynamic mic like a Shure SM 57 or 58 be sure and boost the 300 – 350 lower midrange a bit to warm up the tone a bit. These mics drop off in that register leaving the sax sounding pretty tinny.

The next link in the recording chain is the compressor. The compressor will bring up the volume on the soft parts and prevent the signal from getting too hot on the loud parts. It also allows you to move around a little so you can have some freedom of movement while doing your takes. I get the best results in my home studio when plugging the mic directly into the compressor and the compressor directly in to the signal path. If you don’t have a compressor, plug the mic directly in. Wherever possible, eliminate any unnecessary circuitry to get the cleanest signal. The track will get remixed and this is where you should apply EQ and effects. The dbx 163X is a nearly foolproof compressor with only a level set and compression slider to worry about. Once the level is adjusted (usually between 0 & -10) experiment to determine where the slider goes. With the sax, around -21 is usually about right. You want just enough so that everything you play gets recorded at a good level without sounding too processed.

Always add reverb post (during mixdown). This way you get the verb in stereo while leaving your track mono (better for placement during mixdown) Because of the delicate nature of the reverb overtones, they can get easily get obscured if they are recorded while tracking. Most processors have a wide selection of presets to choose from. Because of the saxophone’s voice-like quality the hall and vocal plates work very well. For a funkier, more Sanborn like sound try the small club settings with more early reflections. You can use way more signal with these to achieve that kind of boxiness that sounds great where you don’t want an audible trail.

If you’ve ever tried to emulate those recordings where the sax is swimming in a huge reverb, you will have discovered by adding that much it sounds like it’s down at the end of the hall. So how do we keep the horn ‘in your face’ i.e. up front, and get that hugeness? Here’s the secret: Use a large hall setting and set the pre-delay parameter to around 250ms. This allows a quarter of a second of everything you play to go on dry before the effect kicks in. It works beautifully on ballads and gives the horn a truly magnificent sound.

Here’s a mixing technique they use on the big money recordings that can work well for the home recordist. Say you have an eight bar intro, then in you come. Use the pan controls at about 5 to 1 o’clock on the whole mix so that it is just about mono. When the sax comes in, pan down to full stereo. This is a subtle effect but will give the listener the impression that something magical occurred just as you started playing. Keep the magic coming!

©2008 Paul Wainwright

See Also : Study Abroad Brazil Dog Accessories

Bookmark and Share

Simplicity 7780 Sewing Pattern Misses Mandarin Collar Blouse Size 14 – Bust 36

March 6th, 2010

Simplicity 7780 Sewing Pattern Misses Mandarin Collar Blouse Size 14 – Bust 36 Simplicity: The blouses have high round neckline, front button closing and set-in sleeves. V. 1 and 2 have shirt-type collar and optional top-stitching. V. 3 and 4 have “stand-up” collar. V. 1 and 3 have long sleeves gathered to buttoned cuffs. V. 2 and 4 have short sleeves with turn back cuffs. V. 1 has button trimmed patch pockets. V. 2 has contrasting collar. V. 3 has lace edging trim. read more

Visit : Networking.Macpress.Org

Bookmark and Share

Ordinary Differential Equations (Classics in Applied Mathematics)

March 3rd, 2010

Ordinary Differential Equations (Classics in Applied Mathematics) Carrier and Pearson is a very interesting book. It is quite concise, and it severely restricts its scope in order to achieve depth – it covers little besides exact, approximate, and (some) numerical solution techniques for first-order and second-order linear ODEs. Its main property is that it takes a simple, highly heuristic approach to these ODEs and is full of rather tough problems, which take up about as much space in the text as the exposition. (Indeed, the authors claim that 78% of the value of the book lies in doing the problems.) It is moderately difficult; I would not recommend C&P to most students as a first text.

The most attractive feature of C&P is indeed its problems, which make vigorous use of the solution techniques presented, introduce the reader to new techniques at times, and give some insight into exactly when those techniques are applicable. If one were to do all of the problems (something I certainly have not done), he or she would really know this subject! C&P’s exposition is high in quality, too; when working on a problem set in my second course on ODEs, I would often turn to C&P and find a clean, short, understandable explanation of the tool I needed.

Its drawbacks largely stem from the same philosophy that makes it such a nice book about low-order linear ODEs. Its treatment makes heavy use of basic algebraic manipulation, and it avoids theory almost entirely. C&P eschews the vector-space ideas that clarify topics like the solution of nonhomogeneous linear equations. The simplifying emphasis on basic algebra also obscures the generalization of things like the Wronskian to higher-order systems, and it certainly prevents an even remotely rigorous treatment of Sturm-Liouville systems or eigenfunction expansions. The lack of a modern, geometric view of ODEs (cf. Arnol’d, Ordinary Differential Equations) does not help the student in later making a transition to qualitative considerations of nonlinear ODEs, and it prevents an appreciation of how special the standard linear solution techniques are. C&P also avoids complex analysis; while this is good for a student who has not studied complex variables, the lack of complex analysis means that C&P only inverts Laplace transforms with tables (not contour integration) and has no treatment at all of Fourier transforms. Also, the emphasis on problems means that some very important techniques (like variation of parameters) show up only in the problems.

Whether or not this book is a worthwhile buy depends on the reader. It is great for learning a number of applied-mathematical techniques by the Socratic method. However, it fails as an encyclopedic reference, a mathematician’s textbook, or a gateway to nonlinear dynamical systems theory. At any rate, it is a unique book, and at least a portion of science/engineering students would benefit from it. : Offers an alternative to the “rote” approach of presenting standard categories of differential equations accompanied by routine problem sets. The exercises presented amplify and provide perspective for the material, often giving readers opportunity for ingenuity. Little or no previous acquaintance with the subject is required to learn usage of techniques for constructing solutions of differential equations in this reprint volume.
Ordinary Differential Equations (Classics in Applied Mathematics)

Friends Link : Childhood Education Www Idiskhost Com Appellateattorney.Estudiantis.Com

Bookmark and Share